Feature
Calibration that feels fair, not political
Compare ratings against evidence instead of memory or manager confidence. Original ratings stay visible, calibrated ratings are explicit, and decisions are easier to defend.
Why teams care
Give skip-level leaders and managers a cleaner way to calibrate ratings with evidence, transparency, and fewer spreadsheet debates.
- Skip-level calibration with transparent before-and-after ratings
- Evidence snapshots reduce recency bias during calibration
- Better consistency across managers and teams
- Labeled "Rating Review" inside the EvalSuite product
Bring evidence into the room
Calibration breaks down when the loudest manager wins. Evidence, scorecards, and historical context start the discussion from actual performance inputs.
Preserve accountability
Leaders can adjust ratings without erasing the manager signal. Both views are stored so teams see where calibration changed the outcome.
Scale past spreadsheet calibration
Once multiple managers review multiple teams, spreadsheet calibration breaks. A dedicated place to compare, adjust, and document rating decisions.
Make calibration easier to defend
See how evidence-based scorecards and skip-level calibration work together in EvalSuite for growing teams.